Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ginny Poe's avatar

I grew up in a public school setting that encouraged the rat race of grades and rewarded all A’s students with gold cards that granted them all sorts of privileges, e.g. off-campus lunches, reduced ticket prices at the movie theater, ice cream socials, etc… It was an exclusive and rather toxic environment that was completely taken for granted.

I have since worked as a teacher at an independent K-12 school that in lieu of grades uses narrative assessment and a metric of 5 C’s (character, creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication) and I’ve been astounded at how effective this model can be in reducing the air of competition and helping students learn for learning’s sake. Particularly with the collaboration metric, we see students recognizing the value of others’ ideas and input in reaching a goal. I would love to see this method adopted more throughout schools, as it would undoubtedly help to curb the hyper-individualist mindset that keeps partitioning us off from one another.

Expand full comment
Daniel's avatar

Some late-night rambling and incomplete thoughts -

C- and D-students, and even B-students, haven’t experienced deeply, or even enough, of what success feels like.

Conversely, A-students are missing the innovative power of failing.

Is there anything more devastating than being labeled a [Letter-grade]-student? Even, or especially, in casual or overheard conversation?

Does effort need to equal identity?

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts